9 May 2026
Heroics and the system that required rescuing.
Every late-night save is a system that did not catch the issue earlier. The best operators stop rewarding heroics and start rewarding boredom.
One thing I have noticed in high-growth delivery teams: they accidentally reward heroics. The person who saves the client relationship at 11pm on Thursday becomes the benchmark. The internal narrative cements around them.
Almost nobody asks the prior question: why did the system require rescuing in the first place?
Heroics are a signal of architectural debt. Every late-night save is a process that did not catch the issue earlier, a handoff that did not communicate, a decision right that was not clear, a metric that was not watched. The hero is doing the work the system should have done.
The seductive part of AI right now is that it can make heroic teams faster at being heroic. The actual move is to use AI to surface where the heroics keep being needed and to fix the system there.
The best operators I know stop rewarding heroics and start rewarding boredom. Boring delivery means the system is doing its job.
More from the Friday Frame archive.
- 16 May 2026
Outcome ownership needs control.
Vendors are being asked to commit to business outcomes they cannot solely steer. Outcome ownership without control is not a contract. It is ...
- 15 May 2026
Friday Frame: the standing order.
The 200-word weekly missive starts here. Operators, governance, Asia-Pacific. One thing I noticed this week, every Friday.
- 2 May 2026
Delivery model or coping mechanism?
Most AI adoption is the second. Coping faster than competitors is a real advantage, for a while. But it has a shelf life.