2 May 2026
Delivery model or coping mechanism?
Most AI adoption is the second. Coping faster than competitors is a real advantage, for a while. But it has a shelf life.
Worth pulling these two apart, because they look identical at the surface and produce very different outcomes.
A new delivery model means the work itself has changed. Different inputs, different sequence, different team shape, different commercial frame. The customer experiences something they could not get before.
A coping mechanism means the existing work is now done faster or cheaper. Same workflow, same handoffs, same accountability lines. AI absorbs operational strain that was about to break the model. Margins improve. The customer sees the same product.
Most of the AI adoption I see is the second. That is not a criticism. Coping faster than your competitors is a real advantage, for a while. But it is not transformation, and it has a shelf life. Once everyone has the same coping mechanism, the margin advantage disappears and you are back at the start with a smaller team.
The question to ask is which one your AI strategy is funding. If you cannot answer cleanly, the budget is propping up the old model rather than building the new one.
More from the Friday Frame archive.
- 16 May 2026
Outcome ownership needs control.
Vendors are being asked to commit to business outcomes they cannot solely steer. Outcome ownership without control is not a contract. It is ...
- 15 May 2026
Friday Frame: the standing order.
The 200-word weekly missive starts here. Operators, governance, Asia-Pacific. One thing I noticed this week, every Friday.
- 9 May 2026
Heroics and the system that required rescuing.
Every late-night save is a system that did not catch the issue earlier. The best operators stop rewarding heroics and start rewarding boredo...